Quotations about Freedom Related Quotes      Censorship      Human Rights      USA Patriotism | The fact, in short, is that freedom, to be meaningful in an organized society must consist of an amalgam of hierarchy of freedoms and restraints. ~Samuel Hendel He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself. ~Thomas Paine History does not teach fatalism. There are moments when the will of a handful of free men breaks through determinism and opens up new roads. ~Charles de Gaulle

Freedom has its life in the hearts, the actions, the spirit of men and so it must be daily earned and refreshed – else like a flower cut from its life-giving roots, it will wither and die. ~Dwight D. Eisenhower Liberty is the possibility of doubting, of making a mistake,… of searching and experimenting,… of saying No to any authority – literary, artistic, philosophical, religious, social, and even political. ~Ignazio Silone, The God That Failed, 1950 Liberty: One of Imagination’s most precious possessions. ~Ambrose Bierce, The Devil’s Dictionary The patriot’s blood is the seed of Freedom’s tree. Thomas Campbell Nothing is more difficult, and therefore more precious, than to be able to decide. ~Napoleon Bonaparte Here is my advice as we begin the century that will lead to 2081. First, guard the freedom of ideas at all costs. Be alert that dictators have always played on the natural human tendency to blame others and to oversimplify. And don’t regard yourself as a guardian of freedom unless you respect and preserve the rights of people you disagree with to free, public, unhampered expression. ~Gerard K. O’Neill, 2081 Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves. Abraham Lincoln I wish that every human life might be pure transparent freedom. ~Simone de Beauvoir My definition of a free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular. ~Adlai Stevenson, speech, Detroit, 1952 It is easy to take liberty for granted, when you have never had it taken from you. ~Author unknown, sometimes attributed to M. Grundler We on this continent should never forget that men first crossed the Atlantic not to find soil for their ploughs but to secure liberty for their souls. ~Robert J. McCracken You have freedom when you’re easy in your harness. ~Robert Frost

For what avail the plough or sail, or land or life, if freedom fail? ~Ralph Waldo Emerson Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it. ~Thomas Paine In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed; it must be achieved. ~Franklin D. Roosevelt We have to call it “freedom”: who’d want to die for “a lesser tyranny”? ~Mignon McLaughlin, The Neurotic’s Notebook, 1960 Freedom is the oxygen of the soul. ~Moshe Dayan There are two freedoms – the false, where a man is free to do what he likes; the true, where he is free to do what he ought. Charles Kingsley No one is free when others are oppressed. ~Author Unknown Nations grown corrupt Love bondage more than liberty; Bondage with ease than strenuous liberty. ~John Milton Just, harmonious, temperate as is the spirit of liberty, there is in the name and mere notion of it a vagueness so opposite to the definite clearness of the moral law…. ~Augustus William Hare and Julius Charles Hare, Guesses at Truth, by Two Brothers, 1827 Freedom means choosing your burden. ~Hephzibah Menuhin Most people want security in this world, not liberty. ~H. L. Mencken, Minority Report, 1956

We feel free when we escape – even if it be but from the frying pan into the fire. ~Eric Hoffer Men fight for freedom, then they begin to accumulate laws to take it away from themselves. ~Author Unknown Freedom is that instant between when someone tells you to do something and when you decide how to respond. ~Jeffrey Borenstein Liberty is always dangerous, but it is the safest thing we have. ~Harry Emerson Fosdick Freedom is not enough. ~Lyndon B. Johnson Liberty has never come from the government. Liberty has always come from the subjects of it. The history of liberty is a history of resistance. Woodrow Wilson The sound of tireless voices is the price we pay for the right to hear the music of our own opinions. ~Adlai Stevenson, speech, New York City, 28 August 1952 We must be free not because we claim freedom, but because we practice it. ~William Faulkner They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 Everywhere the human soul stands between a hemisphere of light and another of darkness on the confines of two everlasting hostile empires, – Necessity and Free Will. Thomas Carlyle, Essays, “The Opera” We have enjoyed so much freedom for so long that we are perhaps in danger of forgetting how much blood it cost to establish the Bill of Rights. ~Felix Frankfurter O Liberty…! is it well To leave the gates unguarded? ~Thomas Bailey Aldrich No man can put a chain about the ankle of his fellow man without at last finding the other end fastened about his own neck. ~Frederick Douglass, speech, Civil Rights Mass Meeting, Washington, D. C. , 1883 Let freedom never perish in your hands. ~Joseph Addison Who speaks of liberty while the human mind is in chains? ~Francis Wright, 1828

Liberty, when it begins to take root, is a plant of rapid growth. ~George Washington I believe there are more instances of the abridgment of the freedom of the people by gradual and silent encroachments of those in power than by violent and sudden usurpations. ~James Madison, speech, Virginia Convention, 1788 Liberty doesn’t work as well in practice as it does in speeches. ~Will Rogers Freedom is not worth having if it does not connote freedom to err. ~Mahatma Gandhi Order without liberty and liberty without order are equally destructive. ~Theodore Roosevelt We cannot defend freedom abroad by deserting it at home. Edward R. Murrow Freedom has a thousand charms to show, That slaves, howe’er contented, never know. ~William Cowper Most men, after a little freedom, have preferred authority with the consoling assurances and the economy of effort which it brings. ~Walter Lippmann, A Preface to Morals, 1929 The contest for ages has been to rescue liberty from the grasp of executive power. ~Daniel Webster Freedom is nothing else but a chance to be better. ~Albert Camus Men fight for liberty and win it with hard knocks. Their children, brought up easy, let it slip away again, poor fools. And their grandchildren are nce more slaves. ~D. H. Lawrence, Classical American Literature, 1922 I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery. ~Author Unknown Freedom is the will to be responsible to ourselves. ~Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols, 1888 The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding. ~Louis D. Brandeis When the People contend for their liberty, they seldom get anything for their Victory but new Masters. ~George Savile Without freedom, no one really has a name. ~Milton Acorda A nation may lose its liberties in a day and not miss them in a century. Baron de Montesquieu Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it. ~George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman, “Maxims: Liberty and Equality,” 1905 The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion. ~Edmund Burke We anarchists do not want to emancipate the people; we want the people to emancipate themselves. ~Errico Malatesta, l’Agitazione, 18 June 1897 Freedom is never free. ~Author Unknown We are free, truly free, when we don’t need to rent our arms to anybody in order to be able to lift a piece of bread to our mouths. ~Ricardo Flores Magon, speech, 31 May 1914

Many politicians are in the habit of laying it down as a self-evident proposition that no people ought to be free till they are fit to use their freedom. The maxim is worthy of the fool in the old story who resolved not to go into the water till he had learned to swim. ~Thomas Macaulay My definition of a free society is a society where it is safe to be unpopular. Adlai E. Stevenson Jr. (1900 – 1965), Speech in Detroit, 7 Oct. 1952 Freedom is just Chaos, with better lighting. Alan Dean Foster, “To the Vanishing Point” Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom.

Albert Einstein (1879 – 1955), ‘Out of My Later Years,’ 1950 The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle (384 BC – 322 BC), Politics Because you are in control of your life. Don’t ever forget that. You are what you are because of the conscious and subconscious choices you have made. Barbara Hall, A Summons to New Orleans, 2000 Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706 – 1790), Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759 If you want to be free, there is but one way; it is to guarantee an equally full measure of liberty to all your neighbors.

There is no other. Carl Schurz (1829 – 1906) We hold in our hands, the most precious gift of all: Freedom. The freedom to express our art. Our love. The freedom to be who we want to be. We are not going to give that freedom away and no one shall take it from us! Diane Frolov and Andrew Schneider, Northern Exposure, Cicely, 1992 Only the educated are free. Epictetus (55 AD – 135 AD), Discourses In the truest sense, freedom cannot be bestowed; it must be achieved. Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882 – 1945), Speech, September 22, 1936 Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it. George Bernard Shaw (1856 – 1950)

The First Amendment is often inconvenient. But that is besides the point. Inconvenience does not absolve the government of its obligation to tolerate speech. Justice Anthony Kennedy (1936 – ) Patterning your life around other’s opinions is nothing more than slavery. Lawana Blackwell, The Dowry of Miss Lydia Clark, 1999 While the State exists, there can be no freedom. When there is freedom there will be no State. Lenin (1870 – 1924), “State and Revolution”, 1919 Liberty is not a means to a higher political end. It is itself the highest political end. Lord Acton, Lecture, February 26, 1877 Nobody can give you freedom.

Nobody can give you equality or justice or anything. If you’re a man, you take it. Malcolm X (1925 – 1965), Malcolm X Speaks, 1965 You can’t separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom. Malcolm X (1925 – 1965), Malcolm X Speaks, 1965 It is by the goodness of God that in our country we have those three unspeakably precious things: freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the prudence never to practice either of them. Mark Twain (1835 – 1910), Following the Equator (1897) Self-reliance is the only road to true freedom, and being one’s own person is its ultimate reward.

Patricia Sampson To know what you prefer instead of humbly saying Amen to what the world tells you you ought to prefer, is to have kept your soul alive. Robert Louis Stevenson (1850 – 1894) People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use. Soren Kierkegaard (1813 – 1855) I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. Thomas Jefferson (1743 – 1826), to Archibald Stuart, 1791 The love of liberty is the love of others; the love of power is the love of ourselves.

Freedom Does Not Mean License But Wisdom To Choose What Is Right For Oneself * Home Page» * Governments» * U. S. Government We have many premium term papers and essays on Freedom Does Not Mean License But Wisdom To Choose What Is Right For Oneself. We also have a wide variety of research papers and book reports available to you for free. You can browse our collection of term papers or use our search engine. Freedom Does Not Mean License But Wisdom To Choose What Is Right For Oneself Freedom Does Not Mean License But Wisdom To Choose What Is Right For Oneself ?

Freedom Doesn’t Mean Liecence But The Wisdom The Choose   What Is Right For Oneself freedom doesn’t mean liecence but the domm the choose what is right for oneselfTo me, having the right of freedom of speech means that I can voice my opinion wherever and whenever I feel the urge to without the fear of being prosecuted. The United States would be in an extremely weak state if citizens did not have the right to freedom of speech. Without freedom of speech in our Bill of Rights, people could not necessarily stand up for what they believed in.

I think that if a person has a valid point or even an unvalid point that they want to voice nothing should stand in their path. It would be nearly impossible for certain organizations to form if the United States was without freedom of speech. Freedom of speech means to me that these certain radical organizations should be and are allowedto voice their opinions and views on different issues on which some people feel uncomfortable about. These issues may involve issues that I do not agree on; however, I feel that the group of people have the right to express their beliefs.

Also, freedom of speech means to me that America is one of the best countries that involves the people. There is not one person making all of the decisions for the American citizens, so it is possible to have numerous ideas in the government. People who voice their opinions can pursway the many government officials to change their positions on certain issues. If the United States did not possess the right to freedom of speech, then there would be hardly any reason for the government official to change his or her position on a certain issue.

I believe that it is important for people to express their opinions and ideas so that the American public can catch a glimpse of the opposite sides of different views. I believe that freedom of speech is a great aspect of the American… government, and which also illustrates that the United States is a mature nation that respects and takes into consideration all of the ideas of all of the nations’ Freedom Doesn’t Mean License But The Wisdom To Choose What Is Right For One Self He drew a circle that shut me out – Heretic, rebel, a thing to pout.

But Love and I had the wit to win: We drew a circle that took him in! – Edwin Markham What This Book is about? How can one distinguish between freedom and license? a publisher in the U. S. A. implores Edwin Markham to write a whole book in explanation of these terms, saying, “You must, for so many Americanparents who have read SUMMERHILL feel guilty about the strict way they have treated their child, and then tell their child that from now on he is free. The result is usually a spoiled brat, for the parents have scant notion of what freedom is.

They do not realize that freedom is a give and take-freedom for parents as well as freedom for the child. As I understand it, freedom – does not mean that the child can do everything he wants to do, nor have everything he wants to have. ” Yes, that simply stated, is the crux of the matter. Freedom, over-extended, turns into license. I define license as interfering with another’s freedom. For example, in   school a child is free to go to lessons or stay away from lessons because that is his own affair, but be is wt free to play a trumpet when others want to study or sleep.

Every child is selfish-Me first! Parents must appreciate and accept that stage for what it is; at the same time, they must refuse to give Junior the license to do everything he wants to do. How can children develop self-control if they are never restrained from doing whatever they want to do? is a question I am often asked. But who ever advocated a child’s always doing what he wants to do? Junior can decide what he doesn’t want to do. What is the true definition of self-control? Is it just good manners. n my opinion self- control means the ability to think of other people, to respect the rights of other people. No self-controlled man ever sits down with others and helps himself to half the salad in the salad… This article is about the political philosophy. For other uses, see Liberty (disambiguation). | Part of a series on| Freedom| | Concepts| Liberty (positive · negative individual · social)Rights Free will Personal responsibility| By type| Academic · Civil Economic · Intellectual Political · Scientific| By right| Assembly · Association Education · Information

Movement · Press Religion · Speech Thought| v • d • e| Liberty is the concept of ideological and political philosophy that identifies the condition to which an individual has the right to behave according to one’s own personal responsibility and free will. The conception of liberty is impacted by ideals concerning the social contract as well as arguments that are concerned with the state of nature. Individualist and classical liberal conceptions of liberty relate to the freedom of the individual from outside compulsion or coercion and this is defined as negative liberty.

Social liberal conceptions of liberty relate freedom to social structure and agency and this is defined as positive liberty. In feudal times, a liberty was an area of allodial land in which regalian rights had been waived. Contents[hide] * 1 Philosophy * 2 Freedom as a triadic relation * 3 Liberty and political thought * 3. 1 Concepts of liberty in history * 3. 2 Social contract * 3. 3 Modern perspectives * 3. 4 United States * 4 Liberty Canon * 5 See also * 6 References| [edit] Philosophy Main article: Freedom (philosophy) This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding reliable references. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2009)| Opinions on what constitute liberty can vary widely, but can be generally classified as positive liberty and negative liberty. Positive liberty asserts that freedom is found in a person’s ability to having agency, particularly in the sense of having the power and resources to carry out their own will, without being inhibited by the structural inhibitions from society such as racism, classism or sexism.

In the negative sense, one is considered free to the extent to which no person interferes with his or her activity. According to Thomas Hobbes, for example, “a free man is he that… is not hindered to do what he hath the will to do. ” John Stuart Mill. John Stuart Mill, in his work, On Liberty, was the first to recognize the difference between liberty as the freedom to act and liberty as the absence of coercion. [1] In his book, Two Concepts of Liberty, Isaiah Berlin formally framed the differences between these two perspectives as the distinction between two opposite concepts of liberty: positive liberty and negative liberty.

The latter designates a negative condition in which an individual is protected from tyranny and the arbitrary exercise of authority, while the former refers to having the means or opportunity, rather than the lack of restraint, to do things. Mill offered insight into the notions of soft tyranny and mutual liberty with his harm principle. [2] It can be seen as important to understand these concepts when discussing liberty since they all represent little pieces of the greater puzzle known as freedom. In a philosophical sense, it can be said that morality must supersede tyranny in any legitimate form of government.

Otherwise, people are left with a societal system rooted in backwardness, disorder, and regression. The Statue of Liberty, donated to the US by France, an artistic personification of the concept. The concept of negative liberty has several noteworthy aspects. First, negative liberty defines a realm or “zone” of freedom (in the “silence of law”). In Berlin’s words, “liberty in the negative sense involves an answer to the question ‘What is the area within which the subject — a person or group of persons — is or should be left to do or be what he is able to do or be, without interference by other persons. Some philosophers have disagreed on the extent of this realm while accepting the main point that liberty defines that realm in which one may act unobstructed by others. Second, the restriction (on the freedom to act) implicit in negative liberty is imposed by a person or persons and not due to causes such as nature, lack, or incapacity. Helvetius expresses this point clearly: “The free man is the man who is not in irons, nor imprisoned in a gaol (jail), nor terrorized like a slave by the fear of punishment… it is not lack of freedom not to fly like an eagle or swim like a whale. The dichotomy of positive and negative liberty is considered specious by political philosophers in traditions such as socialism, social democracy, libertarian socialism, and Marxism. Some of them argue that positive and negative liberty are indistinguishable in practice, while others claim that one kind of liberty cannot exist independently of the other. A common argument is that the preservation of negative liberty requires positive action on the part of the government or society to prevent some individuals from taking away the liberty of others.

A socialist, liberal and progressive defines liberty as being connected to the reasonably equitable distribution of wealth, arguing that the unrestrained concentration of wealth (the means of production) into only a few hands negates liberty. In other words, without relatively equal ownership, the subsequent concentration of power and influence into a small portion of the population inevitably results in the domination of the wealthy and the subjugation of the poor. Thus, freedom and material equality are seen as intrinsically connected.

On the other hand, the classical liberal argues that wealth cannot be evenly distributed without force being used against individuals which reduces individual liberty. [edit] Freedom as a triadic relation In 1967, Gerald MacCallum argued that proponents of positive and negative liberty converge on a single definition of liberty, but simply have different approaches in establishing it. According to McCallum, freedom is a triadic relationship: “x is/is not free from y to do/not to do or become/not become z”. In this way, rather than defining liberty in erms of two separate paradigms, positive and negative liberty, he defined liberty as a single, complete formula. The question is whether this formula fully captures what positive liberty means. Positive liberty, understood as “internal forces which determine how a person shall act”[3] is saying more than ‘x is free to do z. ‘ One is free when one becomes the ideal of oneself, which includes MacCallum’s triadic relation; but the latter alone is insufficient to fully capture what positive liberty means. [citation needed] [edit] Liberty and political thought [edit] Concepts of liberty in history

Freedom (ama-gi) written in Sumerian cuneiform The first known use of the word freedom in a political context dates back to the 24th century BC, in a text describing the restoration of social and economic liberty in Lagash, a Sumerian city-state. Urukagina, the king of Lagash, established the first known legal code to protect citizens from the rich and powerful. Known as a great reformer, Urukagina established laws that forbade compelling the sale of property and required the charges against the accused to be stated before any man accused of a crime could be punished.

This is the first known example of any form of due process in the history of humanity. Like Urukagina, most ancient freedoms focused on negative liberty, protecting the less fortunate from harassment or imposition. Other ancient legal codes, such as the Code of Hammurabi, similarly forbade compulsion in economic matters, like the sale of land, and made it clear that when a rich man murders a poor one, it is still murder. Still, these codes relied on a certain virtuousness of kings and ministers, which was far from reliable.

In the Persian Empire, citizens of all religions and ethnic groups were given the same rights and had the same freedom of religion, women had the same rights as men, and slavery was abolished. [when? ] All the palaces of the kings of Persia were built by paid workers in an era where slaves typically did such work. [4] In the Buddhist Maurya Empire of ancient India, citizens of all religions and ethnic groups had rights to freedom, tolerance, and equality. The need for tolerance on an egalitarian basis can be found in the Edicts of Ashoka the Great, which emphasize the importance of tolerance in public policy by the government.

The slaughter or capture of prisoners of war was also condemned by Ashoka. [5] Slavery was also non-existent in the Maurya Empire. [6] Ashoka’s orders seem to have been resisted right from the beginning. [7] Roman law also embraced certain limited forms of liberty, even under the rule of the Roman Emperors. However, these liberties were accorded only to Roman citizens. Still, the Roman citizen enjoyed a combination of positive liberty (the right to a trial, a right of appeal, law and contract enforcement) and negative liberty (unhindered right to contract and the right to not be tortured).

Many of the liberties enjoyed under Roman law endured through the Middle Ages, but were enjoyed solely by the nobility, never by the common man. The idea of unalienable and universal liberties had to wait until the Age of Enlightenment. In Chinese, freedom is written ?? (ziyou). ?(zi) is the character for self, and ? (you) is the character to follow, with an additional connotation of reason. Liberty thus implies a necessary connection between individualism and a rational duty. [edit] Social contract Eugene Delacroix – La liberte guidant le peuple (1830) In French Liberty.

British Slavery (1792), James Gillray caricatured French “liberty” as the opportunity to starve, and British “slavery” as bloated complaints about taxation. The social contract theory, invented by Hobbes, John Locke and Rousseau, were among the first to provide a political classification of rights, in particular through the notion of sovereignty and of natural rights. The thinkers of the Enlightenment reasoned the assertion that law governed both heavenly and human affairs, and that law gave the king his power, rather than the king’s power giving force to law.

The divine right of kings was thus opposed to the sovereign’s unchecked auctoritas. This conception of law would find its culmination in Montesquieu’s thought. The conception of law as a relationship between individuals, rather than families, came to the fore, and with it the increasing focus on individual liberty as a fundamental reality, given by “Nature and Nature’s God,” which, in the ideal state, would be as expansive as possible. The Enlightenment created then, among other ideas, liberty: that is, of a free individual being most free within the context of a state which provides stability of the laws.

Later, more radical philosophies such as socialism articulated themselves in the course of the French Revolution and in the 19th century. [edit] Modern perspectives The modern conceptions of democracy, whether representative democracies or other types of democracies, are all found on the Rousseauist idea of popular sovereignty. [original research? ] Liberalism is a political current embracing several historical and present-day ideologies that claim defense of individual liberty as the purpose of government. Two main strands are apparent, although both are founded on an individualist ideology.

Economic liberalism is the right of the individual to contract, trade and operate in a market free of constraint. Social liberalism is the right to dissent from orthodox tenets or established authorities in political or religious matters. Both are core political issues, and highly contentious. [citation needed] [edit] United States In the United States Supreme Court decision Griswold v. Connecticut, Justice William O. Douglas argued that liberties relating to personal relationships, such as marriage, have a unique primacy of place in the hierarchy of freedoms. [8] Jacob M.

Appel has summarized this principle: I am grateful that I have rights in the proverbial public square—but, as a practical matter, my most cherished rights are those that I possess in my bedroom and hospital room and death chamber. Most people are far more concerned that they can control their own bodies than they are about petitioning Congress. [9] A school of thought popular among U. S. libertarians holds that there is no tenable distinction between the two sorts of liberty—that they are, indeed, one and the same, to be protected (or opposed) together. In the context of U.

S. constitutional law, for example, they point out that the constitution twice lists “life, liberty, and property” without making any distinctions within that troika. Anarcho-Individualists, such as Max Stirner, demanded the utmost respect for the liberty of the individual. Some in the U. S. see protecting the ideal of liberty as a conservative policy, because this would conform to the spirit of individual liberty that they consider is at the heart of the American constitution. Some think liberty is almost synonymous with democracy, at least in one sense of that ord, while others see conflicts or even opposition between the two concepts, with democracy being nothing more than the tyranny of the majority. Best Answer – Chosen by Voters Don’t be ridiculous! India is way, way ahead of where it was when I was a child, when we heard about the people sleeping on the streets, and how many did not get up in the morning. When there were pictures of starving children in India the likes of which we now see only from Africa. Certainly India still has a long way to go to combat poverty; so does the US, for that matter.

But India is getting to be very high-tech and modern, and involved in world commerce, and the economic situation seems to have a very healthy future, if an only moderately healthy present. I do not agree with you. Indians are more resistant to diseases as they are immune. Our body gets conditioned to external and internal factors that affect our health. Other nations who boast of good environmental conditions have more people suffering from a variety of diseases. People in the USA are afraid of a simple flu. In India, people go to work even with a running temperature and colds.

Most urban cities in India are modernized moreso westernized due to which exercise levels have gone down, people are more busy with their daily activities than in the towns and villages. Our villages have healthier life and lifestyles than urban areas. Umm, quite the opposite in fact. The weak, unhealthy and disease prone of India are among the poorest of the population (as usual). This includes many people who live in densely populated slum areas, or out in the country where health care and decent sanitation are primitive or unaffordable for them.

Poor health is almost always associated with economic disadvantage, wherever you go in the world. I understood your question,you are right ,but other answerers did not understand your question,hence opposed it. If you explain your points one by one every one will agree. We should do that & tell about this to all . Other wise ,next generation will face severe problem-Modern living conditions has made the brain of people of my country ,to not even understand your question.

Offcourse,what they have written is correct,but they have in their mind ,only few old diseases,you explain to them Not true – the crushing poverty caused by India’s obsolete Caste system is what made the people of India sick and poor! It’s the old system that is wrong – not the new one. Source(s): It is your slavery and Jim Crow, where a person is judged by the color of their skin (via the caste) just like in America 50 years ago. It may be long before the law of love will be recognised in international affairs.

The machinery’s of government stand between and hide the hearts of one people from those of another. The educated and socially aware people have no issues and given a chance they will always come forward for friendship.. its the fanatics on both side of the border who keep instigating the common man against each other in the name of religion !! In religion elements of hatred has superceeded elements of peace and love and i feel religion has got over abused and loosing its utility in our society as its doing anything but binding the humanity together..

So people from bothside should make it point to make atleast one online or penpal friend on the other side and try grow the network and help understand others to see how similar people on both the sides are… Voter turnout is the percentage of eligible voters who cast a ballot in an election. After increasing for many decades, there has been a trend of decreasing voter turnout in most established democracies since the 1960s. [1] In general, low turnout may be due to disenchantment, indifference, or contentment.

Low turnout is often considered to be undesirable, and there is much debate over the factors that affect turnout and how to increase it. In spite of significant study into the issue, scholars are divided on reasons for the decline. Its cause has been attributed to a wide array of economic, demographic, cultural, technological, and institutional factors. There have been many efforts to increase turnout and encourage voting. Different countries have very different average voter turnouts. For example, in the

United States 2008 presidential election turnout was 63%[2] and 68% among African Americans. In Australia, which has compulsory voting, and Malta, participation reaches 95%. These differences are caused by a mix of cultural and institutional factors. ____________________________________________________________ __________ Yes… Modern living has made people of India weak, unhealthy and disease prone… Modern living means adopting the western culture, smoking, drinking, eating pizzas and burgers, etc. Also working at night times in a BPO or a Call Centre is now a days modern living…..

But this makes u obese and also mentally sick as scientifically it is proved that brain automatically relaxes… So the people working in the companies become mentally ill and sick…… Now don’t we see teens and adults smoking in shops, in parties, on roads…. It is because of maybe stress or even peer pressure…… But smoking reduces 13. 9% of the life….. Isn’t this unhealthy? Smoking also causes many types of cancers such as lung cancer and stomach cancer…. Don’t we see obese people around us? Actually the number of obese people has increased….

It is because most of them eat junk food regularly and some of them twice or thrice a week………… people have all got influenced by the western styles and now are getting lazier …. people doing night duties dont get proper sleep and hence leading to sleep disorders ….. also the busy life of people has made them jump to a easier way of living … ie eating the junk or packed food which is full of preservatives nowadays a walk in the garden has come to a run on the treadmill… You want to go bicycling………. wellll go to the gym and thats the way it goes … xcercise is not only for burning fats and carbohydrates but for gettin in touch with the fresh morning air which keeps u active the whole day,,,,,,,,, it is affecting ,all the people are trying to turn their simple life into sophisticated living. Of course the modern living is directly affecting the people. Now, due to easy availability of many consumer items in the market attracts each and every consumer and they try to procure the item either by spending their saving or taking loan from the banks etc. Both ways the money circulation in the market increases resulting in rise in inflation nd related hardships. Related answers: |[pic]|Against the motion modern living has made the people of india weak unhealthy and disease prone? | | |For many, many years a great majority of the people of India have been living in abject poverty, this of course has | | |created the most terrible conditions for the poulation, sickness, disease and… | |[pic]|Modern living has made the people of india weak unhealthy and diease-prone? | | |has modern living made people of uindia weak and unhealthy pagal ,gadha jaise ans. at do. Answer nahi aata tha to likha | | |hi kyon. ooloo kahinke | |[pic]|Modern living has made people of India weak unhealthy and disease prone. For the topic? | | |many many kinds of leaves | |[pic]|Debate- Modern living has made the people of india weak unhealthy and disease -prone Both for and against the motion? | |yes it has made people of india weak. what about yoga in ancieni india that has the power to cure do many diseases. We can | | |see that even swine flu has been given to us by our modern living. People use… | |[pic]|Moderen living has made the people of india weak unhealthy? | | |”Modern living” has increased the survival rate of new borns, the average life span and the overall health of these | | |people. I would say that is completely wrong. No aspect of their life is worse….